Case 1601550/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. Leyshon v Equilibrium Law Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601550/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M. Leyshon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the matter on the papers under Rule 21. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The judgment records that the claim succeeded. It did not quantify any remedy in the judgment itself, stating instead that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing if requested by the respondent and allowed by an Employment Judge in the exercise of discretion according to the overriding objective.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded under Rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded under Rule 21. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded under Rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.