Case 1601551/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. C. McCarthy v Nassa Travel Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601551/2020
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. C. McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan found for the claimant on both matters recorded in the judgment. The tribunal held that Nassa Travel Ltd breached Ms. C. McCarthy's contract by failing to give notice of termination or make a payment in lieu of notice.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment does not set out any separate statutory basis for that claim in the text provided, and it records the finding in summary form only.
The listed hearing was converted to a remedy hearing with an estimated duration of one hour, although the judgment says that hearing would be cancelled if a remedy judgment could be made under Rule 21 after receipt of the claimant's schedule of loss. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to give notice of termination or make a payment in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.