Case 1601557/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Parry v Ultimate N & B Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601557/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Parry had worked for the respondent as a Beauty Therapist since 30 May 2005. After returning from maternity leave in March 2020 she worked three days a week, paid at £9.50 per hour, amounting to £190 gross per week. The tribunal accepted that from 30 June 2021 she was paid at £123.50 per week instead, and held that her continuing to work after that date did not amount to affirmation of the contract, because the arrangement was understood to be temporary and she needed to provide for her two children. Applying Abrahall & ors v Nottingham City Council and anr [2018] EWCA Civ 796, the tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages of £266 gross for the four-week period before notice was given on 24 July 2021.
On notice pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had 17 complete years' service and was entitled to 12 weeks' notice under s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996. It calculated gross notice pay at £2,280, then gave credit for £380 already received as notice pay and £195 earned in self-employment after the employment ended, leaving £1,705 gross payable. The judgment labels this part 'Notice pay' and makes the award subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It applied the statutory redundancy formula in ss.145, 162 and 164 Employment Rights Act 1996, using 12 years of service at the age-band multiplier of 1 and 5 years at the multiplier of 0.5, producing a redundancy payment of £2,755. The respondent did not enter a response and took no part in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to £190 per week but was paid £123.50 per week from 30 June 2021 to 24 July 2021. The shortfall over four weeks was calculated as £266 gross, and the tribunal applied Abrahall & ors v Nottingham City Council and anr [2018] EWCA Civ 796 on affirmation. | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment is headed 'Notice pay' and applies s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found 17 complete years' service, a 12-week notice entitlement, a gross notice figure of £2,280, and then gave credit for £380 notice pay and £195 self-employed earnings. | Upheld | — | £1,705 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and calculated the statutory redundancy payment under ss.145, 162 and 164 Employment Rights Act 1996 using 12 years at the full-rate multiplier and 5 years at the half-rate multiplier. | Upheld | — | £2,755 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,726
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Abrahall & ors v Nottingham City Council and anr [2018] EWCA Civ 796
- s 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss.145, 162 & 164 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.