Case 1601561/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jones v JES Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601561/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
- Venue
- Carmarthen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Carmarthen hearing on 27 January 2020, Employment Judge R Brace recorded that Mr C Jones's claims against JES Group Ltd for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unpaid holiday pay were not well-founded and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasoning.
The judgment notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, but written reasons were not provided in the record. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written record states that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The written record refers to unpaid holiday pay and states that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.