Case 1601574/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Cullen v St Brides Care Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601574/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Cullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs T Cullen brought claims against St Brides Care Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract, and payment for accrued but untaken holiday. The hearing took place at Cardiff on 15 January 2020 before Employment Judge S Jenkins. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a consultant.
The tribunal dismissed the unauthorised deductions from wages claim. It also dismissed the holiday pay aspect, recording that the claimant had been paid in full in respect of pay for accrued but untaken holiday. No separate remedy was awarded on those dismissed claims.
The breach of contract claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,840.00. The judgment does not set out any further breakdown of that award or any additional interest or separate compensatory elements.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,840.00. | Upheld | — | £1,840 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid in full for accrued but untaken holiday, so this aspect of the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,840
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.