Case 1601589/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bashir v 168 Security Limited (t/a Sword Security) Heard: by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601589/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bashir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was by video on 5 October 2021 before Employment Judge S Jenkins. The claimant disconnected part-way through the hearing after saying he could not hear and did not have written documents or payslips, and the tribunal exercised Rule 47 to continue in his absence. The only issue was whether he was owed payment for accrued but untaken holiday at the end of his casual employment as a security guard.
The tribunal accepted Mr Hendy's evidence that the respondent used a standard contract which expressly provided for rolled-up holiday pay at 12.07% in addition to the basic hourly rate, that the holiday year ran from 1 January to 31 December, and that the clause was brought to the claimant's attention at induction. The payslips from 2020 showed holiday pay added to the claimant's wages, and the respondent kept records of hours worked and holidays taken.
Applying Lyddon v Englefield Brickwork Ltd, Robinson-Steele v R D Retail Services Ltd, Marshall's Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield, Smith v J Morrisroes & Sons Ltd, and Gridquest Ltd v Blackburn, the tribunal found there was a consensual agreement identifying a specific holiday-pay percentage and that the payments were a genuine contractual addition rather than an unagreed unilateral allocation. Although the claimant had accrued 5.64 hours of holiday and had not taken any of it, the tribunal held that the rolled-up holiday pay could be set against that entitlement and that the claim therefore failed and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday under the contract and/or Working Time Regulations 1998; tribunal also considered the respondent's rolled-up holiday pay arrangement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Lyddon v Englefield Brickwork Ltd
- Robinson-Steele v R D Retail Services Ltd
- Marshall's Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield
- Smith v J Morrisroes & Sons Ltd
- Gridquest Ltd v Blackburn
- regulation 16(5) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.