Case 1601600/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Kerry v Kev Pryde Electrical — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601600/2019
- Decision date
- 10 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Kerry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo ET3 response form was filed by the respondent, and Employment Judge Jenkins said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal upheld the claimant's unpaid wages claim.
The judgment recorded the award as unpaid wages (gross) of £3,444.00. It did not provide any separate breakdown of the award into different heads of loss, and it did not set out any contested factual findings because the case was decided in the respondent's absence.
The judgment also stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The hearing listed for 16 January 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; the judgment records the claim as 'Unpaid Wages (gross)' and does not break the award down further. | Upheld | — | £3,444 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,444
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.