Case 1601612/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Hardy v Peter Alan Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601612/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Members
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Hardy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Hardy worked for Peter Alan Ltd from 6 August 2018 until 23 September 2022 and resigned on 26 August 2022. She brought claims for breach of contract and, in the alternative, unlawful deduction from wages arising from non-payment of her August 2022 monthly commission and her Q3 2022 quarterly commission/bonus. The tribunal proceeded on liability only and accepted that the August commission was due on 23 September 2022 and the Q3 payment was due on 25 October 2022.
The tribunal found that the relevant terms were the contract of employment and the March 2022 Lettings Remuneration Scheme. Those terms stated that participation in the bonus scheme was discretionary and that no bonus was payable if the employee was not employed by the company on the date of payment or had tendered resignation or was under notice. The tribunal found that Ms Hardy was familiar with the scheme and knew that she would not be paid commission if she was not in employment on the last working day of the month in which the payment was made.
Applying those terms, the tribunal held that Ms Hardy was not employed on 30 September 2022 or 31 October 2022, so she was not entitled to the August commission or the Q3 commission/bonus. It rejected the submission that the respondent’s position was irrational or perverse, and held that there was no breach of contract. In the alternative, it held that there had been no unauthorised deduction from wages because the non-payment was authorised by the written contract and the remuneration scheme.
The tribunal noted that Ms Hardy received £250 in her final pay under a separate incentivisation scheme relating to RightMove call quality, and found that this payment was payable despite resignation and fell outside the lettings remuneration scheme. That separate payment did not affect the dismissal of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed. The tribunal held that the March 2022 Lettings Remuneration Scheme and the contract of employment expressly provided that commission/bonus was not payable if the employee was not employed on the relevant payment date or had resigned/was under notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed. The tribunal held that any non-payment of the August 2022 commission and Q3 2022 commission/bonus was authorised by the written contract and remuneration scheme for the purposes of s.13 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Clark v BET plc
- Brand v Compro Computer Services Ltd
- Keen v Commerzbank AG
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.