Case 1601617/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Williams v Lionel's Tackle Shop — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601617/2018
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ward Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short rule 37 strike out judgment in case 1601617/2018. Employment Judge Ward recorded that by letter dated 24 July 2019 the Tribunal gave Mr J Williams an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
Mr Williams did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it is a rule 37 strike out for failure to actively pursue the claim. By letter dated 24 July 2019, the Tribunal invited representations or a request for a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant made no representations, or none sufficient, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.