Case 1601631/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lyons v Jelthat Ltd T/A Newport Mazda — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601631/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lyons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Lyons brought a claim for notice pay arising from the end of his employment with Jelthat Ltd T/A Newport Mazda. The tribunal recorded that he had worked as Aftersales Director from August 2018 until December 2019, and that the claim sought £2,366.66. The respondent disputed liability, but the hearing turned first on whether the claim had been presented in time.
The tribunal found that the relevant end date was 6 December 2019 and that the claim was not brought within the three-month limit. It accepted that the claimant said he did not know about the time limit and thought he had 12 months to claim, but the tribunal held that ignorance of time limits was not a reasonable explanation on these facts. It noted that the claimant had already identified a potential claim, had engaged with ACAS, and then took no further action for several months.
Applying the three-month time limit and the question whether it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, the tribunal concluded that the claimant had failed to take the basic steps needed to investigate the applicable deadline. It referred to Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton and said that a claimant aware of the right to complain is generally expected to enquire about the time limit. The tribunal also noted that it had been given no evidence of any difficulty with ACAS or any other obstacle preventing an earlier claim.
The claim for notice pay was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction. No substantive decision on the underlying notice pay dispute was made, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was held to be presented out of time. The tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction because it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within the three-month time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- three month time limit
- reasonably practicable test
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.