Case 1601633/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Graham Price v Skitech Systems Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601633/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Webb Representation
- Venue
- by video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Graham Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment for this case records only that Mr Graham Price was an employee of Skitech Systems Limited within section 230(1) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996 from 9 September 1999 until 4 May 2020. It also records that he was a worker within section 230(3) ERA 1996 for the same period.
The extracted text does not include any substantive findings on unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, breach of contract, or unlawful deduction from wages. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so no further reasoning or remedy figure appears in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted written judgment records only declarations that the claimant was an employee and a worker from 9 September 1999 to 4 May 2020. It does not set out substantive claim outcomes or reasons. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 230(1) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.