Case 1601635/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dumkiewicz v J.M.E. Building and Groundworks Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601635/2021
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Dumkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Brace dealt with the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not filed an ET3 response form. The judge recorded that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination on the papers.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid wages in the gross sum of £753.75 and the claim for unpaid holiday pay in the gross sum of £956.25. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as unpaid wages (gross) and upheld the claim in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £754 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as unpaid holiday pay (gross) and upheld the claim in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £956 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,710
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.