Case 1601637/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Szydlowski v J.M.E. Building and Groundworks Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601637/2021
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Szydlowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Brace gave a Rule 21 judgment on 25 March 2022 because the respondent did not present an ET3 response form. On the material available, the tribunal was satisfied that the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages could be properly determined without a hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages in the gross sum of £1,105.00 against J.M.E. Building and Groundworks Limited. The judgment also notes that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, in the absence of an ET3 response and on the material before the tribunal, the claim for unpaid wages gross of £1,105.00 was upheld under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,105 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,105
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.