Case 1601638/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR WINDROSS (COUNSEL) FOR THE v Miss Broster (director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601638/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR WINDROSS (COUNSEL) FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Povey sat alone in a remote hearing on 29 and 30 September 2021. The tribunal held that Mr M Wood's unfair dismissal claim against FTS Hatswell Limited was made out and allowed it. The claims pursued under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 and section 92 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were withdrawn and were dismissed upon withdrawal.
On remedy, the judgment records a basic award of £1,575.00, loss of earnings of £13,133.23 for 13 March 2020 to 23 August 2020 and £764.91 for 24 August 2020 to 1 March 2021, loss of statutory rights of £500.00, pension loss of £784.00, and a 25% ACAS uplift of £3,795.54. Paragraph 5 states the total monetary award was £20,552.68, with a prescribed element of £13,898.14 for the period 13 March 2020 to 1 March 2021, and that the award exceeded the prescribed element by £6,654.54. Paragraph 3 contains a slightly different total of £20,552.82, so the later figure is used here.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was made out and allowed it. Paragraph 3 states £20,552.82, but the itemised figures and paragraph 5 total £20,552.68; the latter figure is used for the award. | Upheld | — | £20,553 |
| Other | Claim under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (right to be accompanied). The judgment states this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim under section 92 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (written statement of reasons for dismissal). The judgment states this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,553
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,575
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £18,978
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.