Case 1601649/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Cleverdon v Duggan Retail & Leisure Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601649/2022
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Cleverdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Jenkins therefore determined the claim on the papers. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr C Cleverdon, had two successful heads of claim against Duggan Retail & Leisure Group Limited.
First, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £380.84. Second, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £500 gross. The judgment states that the respondent must pay £910.84 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal was found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £380.84 were awarded. | Upheld | — | £381 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; £500 gross was awarded. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £911
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.