Case 1601671/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Thomas v KSR Electronic Systems Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601671/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr K Thomas's claim against KSR Electronic Systems Ltd. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 10 February 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not contain any findings on the substantive merits of the underlying claim.
No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out at the procedural stage. The only outcome recorded is the strike-out under rule 37.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not actively pursue the claim and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 10 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.