Case 1601672/2014 · Employment Tribunal
- MS J RICHARDS ( SOLICITOR) FOR THE v Respondent — 2017
- Case reference
- 1601672/2014
- Decision date
- 8 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- MS M WALTERS, MS M HUMPHRIES
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- MS J RICHARDS ( SOLICITOR) FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, on the morning of the third day of the final hearing, the claimants withdrew all claims through their solicitor. The judgment therefore states that the claims for detriments on the grounds of protected disclosures contrary to s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed on withdrawal, and that the claims of unfair dismissal contrary to s103A Employment Rights Act 1996 were also dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claim for detriments on the grounds of protected disclosures under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 was withdrawn by the claimants on the morning of the third day of the final hearing and therefore dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claims under s103A Employment Rights Act 1996 were withdrawn by the claimants on the morning of the third day of the final hearing and therefore dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.