Case 1601701/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Ms C Whelpley v Cardiff Mind Limited — 2023

Case reference: 1601701/2023
Decision date: 12 December 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Moore Representation
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 17 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms C Whelpley

Respondent

Cardiff Mind Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Ms C Whelpley brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Cardiff Mind Limited. After hearings in Cardiff on 7 and 8 December 2023, Employment Judge S Moore gave an oral judgment recorded in writing on 12 December 2023.

The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The decision does not set out detailed reasons in the written record because the reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the notes state that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.

No remedy was determined at this stage. The judgment states that a remedy hearing shall be listed, so the financial consequences of the finding were left for later determination.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The judgment record notes that a remedy hearing was to be listed, so no substantive remedy was determined in this decision.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.