Case 1601705/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr G Finding (2) Mr G Purnell (3) Mr K Storey v Goldfinch Developments Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601705/2018
- Decision date
- 2 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr G Finding (2) Mr G Purnell (3) Mr K Storey
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment concerns case numbers 1601705/2018, 1601706/2018 and 1601707/2018, heard at Cardiff on 25 February 2019 before Regional Employment Judge B J Clarke. The claimants were Mr G Finding, Mr G Purnell and Mr K Storey. The respondents were Goldfinch Developments Limited and Mr Ram Goyal.
The judgment records only a procedural disposition. It states that the claims against the second respondent, Mr Ram Goyal, are dismissed upon their withdrawal. No substantive findings are given on the underlying claims, and no remedy is recorded.
The order also notes that Goldfinch Developments Limited remained the only respondent after the claims against the second respondent were dismissed. The judgment was dated 25 February 2019 and sent to the parties on 2 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed upon their withdrawal. It does not record any substantive determination of the claims against the first respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.