Case 1601709/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B. Graham v Ms S. Kelly t/a Peninsular Property Management and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601709/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms B. Graham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claim against the first respondent, Ms S. Kelly t/a Peninsular Property Management. It recorded that the second respondent, Twankeys Laundry Ltd, had failed to pay the claimant holiday pay due to her at the termination of her employment.
By concession, Twankeys Laundry Ltd was ordered to pay £57.50, subject to the deduction of tax and National Insurance, in respect of the claimant’s accrued holiday pay. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were requested, so no further reasoning is set out in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim against the first respondent, Ms S. Kelly t/a Peninsular Property Management, was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Twankeys Laundry Ltd conceded liability for accrued holiday pay due at termination and was ordered to pay £57.50, subject to deduction of tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £58 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £58
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.