Case 1601717/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Jervis v Jervis Coaches Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601717/2021
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Jervis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 April 2022, the tribunal heard the case remotely by video from Cardiff before Employment Judge Russell. By consent, the hearing was adjourned to allow the parties to implement agreed terms of settlement.
The judgment records that the claimant agreed to write to the tribunal withdrawing the claim within 7 days of receipt of a COT3 agreement signed by the respondent. Either party could apply to restore the case for further hearing in default. If no such application was received within 8 days of the claimant receiving the signed COT3, the claim would stand dismissed. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the hearing was adjourned by consent to allow implementation of agreed settlement terms; it does not give a separate merits finding on this head. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records settlement of the case as a whole and does not set out a separate disposal or award for this head of claim. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.