Case 1601721/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Thomas v Singh Superstores Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601721/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge sitting alone upheld Mrs D Thomas’s unfair dismissal claim against Singh Superstores Ltd. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair, with reasons given orally at the hearing on 20 January 2020.
On remedy, the tribunal found that the claimant had contributed to her dismissal and that it was just and equitable to reduce both the basic award and the compensatory award by 50%. The tribunal also found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and awarded a 10% uplift on compensation.
The tribunal calculated a basic award of £748.83 and a compensation award including loss of statutory rights of £3,195.91, making a total award of £3,944.74. It also recorded the recoupment figures as a prescribed element of £1,946.50 and a balance of £1,998.24.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,945 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,945
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £749
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,196
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.