Case 1601721/2023 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Ms Tomlin (director) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601721/2023
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at Cardiff on 3 January 2024 before Employment Judge S Povey. The claimant, Mr Lee Powell, appeared in person and the respondent, Primacare Limited, was represented by Ms Tomlin, a director of the company.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal, finding that it was not made out. It also dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages on the basis that it was not made out.
The complaint about the right to a redundancy payment had been withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment records that this claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claim to a redundancy payment had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.