Case 1601725/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Williams v Procter Brothers Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601725/2020
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave Mr C Williams an opportunity by letter dated 11 August 2021 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The short written judgment does not set out merits findings on the underlying allegations, and it refers only to 'the claim' rather than distinguishing between the listed unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages complaints.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the underlying allegations; classification follows the supplied case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the underlying allegations; classification follows the supplied case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.