Case 1601735/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Jenkins v Lowan’s (Wales) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601735/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms Jenkins was dismissed by the respondent on 30 July 2021 by reason of redundancy. It changed the respondent name to Club Lenox Limited, noting that this was the same company. The claimant was 66 years old and had 14 years' continuous service. The tribunal held that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment that had not been paid, and ordered payment of £4,677.75 based on average weekly pay of £222.75.
The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal said that if a fair procedure had been followed, the claimant would probably have been fairly dismissed by reason of redundancy in any event. The basic award would have been £4,677.75, but because a statutory redundancy payment was ordered it was reduced to nil under section 122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal awarded £445.50 for two weeks' loss of earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights, making £945.50 in compensation for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal further found for the claimant on holiday pay and notice pay. Holiday pay was awarded at £1,492.43, representing 33.5 days of accrued but untaken leave at £44.55 per day. The notice pay claim succeeded because the claimant had been dismissed without notice, and £2,673.00 was awarded, equal to 12 weeks' pay at £222.75 per week. The total compensation ordered was £9,788.68.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 30 July 2021, was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment, and had not been paid it. It recorded average weekly pay of £222.75, 14 years' continuous service, and age 66 at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £4,678 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but found that had a fair procedure been followed the claimant would probably have been fairly dismissed by reason of redundancy in any event. The basic award would have been £4,677.75, but it was reduced to nil under section 122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 because a statutory redundancy payment was ordered. Compensation comprised £445.50 for two weeks' loss of earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £946 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £1,492.43 for accrued but untaken holiday pay, calculated as 33.5 days' annual leave at a daily rate of £44.55. | Upheld | — | £1,492 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed without notice and the notice pay claim succeeded. The award was £2,673.00, calculated as 12 weeks' pay at £222.75 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,789
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £946
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.