Case 1601755/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jeduss v Acorn Recruitment Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601755/2019
- Decision date
- 28 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Jeduss
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant under rule 52. No substantive determination of liability was made.
The supplied case context identifies the matter as a race discrimination case against Acorn Recruitment Ltd and Tata Steel, but the judgment itself does not set out any factual findings on the merits. There is no remedy award and no findings on the underlying allegations in the extracted text.
The only outcome recorded is dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal. Employment Judge S Davies signed the judgment on 24 July 2020, and it was sent to the parties on 28 July 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.