Case 1601768/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Davies v Marlin Industries (Wrexham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601768/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Mold & CVP
- Panel members
- Mrs M Walters, Mr B Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr S Davies was a person with the protected characteristic of disability and that Marlin Industries (Wrexham) Limited had constructive knowledge of that disability. It dismissed the disability discrimination claims, which the judgment describes as claims of discrimination arising from disability and failures to make reasonable adjustments, on the basis that they were not well founded.
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim. In the remedy section it recorded that the claimant had already received a statutory redundancy payment equal to the value of the basic award, so no basic award was made. It also found that, but for the respondent's unreasonable response, the claimant would in any event have been dismissed on the effective date of termination, and for that reason it was not just or equitable to make a compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant was a person with the protected characteristic of disability and that the respondent had constructive knowledge of the disability. The claims of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but made no basic award because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment equal to the basic award, and no compensatory award because it was not just or equitable in light of the tribunal's finding that he would in any event have been dismissed on the effective date of termination. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just or equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.