Case 1601768/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Michael Harmina v Heart Rock Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601768/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michael Harmina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Michael Harmina, brought a complaint of non-payment of wages under Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against Heart Rock. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge S Evans, sitting alone, found that the complaint was well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,200 gross. That figure was broken down as £2,800 for gross wages due from 23 August 2021 to 8 October 2021, described as seven weeks, and £400 for gross wages due from 11 October 2021 to 18 October 2021, described as one week. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the award.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons were provided, unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of non-payment of wages contrary to Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £3,200 gross, made up of £2,800 for gross wages due 23/8/21 to 8/10/21 and £400 for gross wages due 11/10/21 to 18/10/21. The claimant was responsible for any tax and employee NI due on the sums awarded. | Upheld | — | £3,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.