Case 1601775/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Pamela Wynn Newcombe v Machynlleth Town Council Heard: Via Video link — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601775/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Powell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Pamela Wynn Newcombe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms Pamela Wynn Newcombe was unfairly dismissed by Machynlleth Town Council. The judgment records the outcome only and does not set out separate liability reasons in the extracted text provided. The hearing took place by video link on 13 and 14 October 2020 before Employment Judge R Powell.
By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £1,701.00, compensation for loss of statutory rights of £500.00, and compensation for net loss of earnings of £9,405.00. The total of the monetary sums recorded in the judgment is £11,606.00. No separate discrimination or wages findings appear in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal finding was followed by a consent order for a basic award of £1,701.00, £500.00 compensation for loss of statutory rights, and £9,405.00 compensation for net loss of earnings. | Upheld | — | £11,606 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,606
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,701
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,905
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.