Case 1601781/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sarah Squires v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601781/2020
- Decision date
- 2 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mr A Fryer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sarah Squires
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Ms Squires' claims of detriment on the ground of protected disclosures and detriment on the ground of health and safety matters succeeded.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of discrimination arising from disability and dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of detriment on the ground of protected disclosures succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of detriment on the ground of health and safety matters succeeded; classified as other because there is no specific health and safety detriment enum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of discrimination arising from disability failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.