Case 1601786/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A Lopes v Bill's Restaurants Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601786/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A Lopes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 September 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted text records no merits findings and no monetary remedy, because the decision was procedural rather than substantive. The judgment was sent to the parties on 21 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive allegations, but the case listing context identifies a race discrimination claim. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying particulars of the claim. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.