Miss K Stephens v Mirus Wales — 2019

Case reference: 1601787/2019
Decision date: 13 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Brace Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss K Stephens

Respondent

Mirus Wales

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal issued a strike-out judgment in respect of the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal. By letter dated 17 November 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why that complaint should not be struck out on the basis that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.

The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.

The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for preliminary hearing on 16 December 2019. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 because it considered it did not have jurisdiction to hear it, and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.