Miss R Sullivan v The Wallich — 2023

Case reference: 1601789/2023
Decision date: 26 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harfield

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss R Sullivan

Respondent

The Wallich

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 03 October 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss R Sullivan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The reasons record only that the strike out followed the claimant's failure to respond adequately to the Tribunal's invitation. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim would be listed for hearing and that a notice of hearing would follow shortly.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or any sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 03 October 2023 inviting comment on whether the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.