Case 1601789/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Sullivan v The Wallich — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601789/2023
- Decision date
- 26 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Sullivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 03 October 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss R Sullivan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The reasons record only that the strike out followed the claimant's failure to respond adequately to the Tribunal's invitation. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim would be listed for hearing and that a notice of hearing would follow shortly.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or any sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 03 October 2023 inviting comment on whether the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.