Case 1601803/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Lewis v RS Taxis 17 Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601803/2018
- Decision date
- 24 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Lewis’ complaint was that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements. She did not attend the hearing, although she had previously been told that attendance was not required and that she could send written evidence or comments in advance. The tribunal noted that it had her bank statements and HMRC records, which it took into account.
Mr Salter attended for RS Taxis 17 Ltd and produced itemised pay statements for the tax year starting April 2018. The respondent’s position was that the required particulars under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 had in fact been provided to the claimant and were correct. The tribunal accepted that evidence and found the complaint unfounded.
The claim was therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint of failure to provide itemised pay statements / written particulars under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.