Case 1601819/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K. Owsiany v Lidl Great Britain Ltd. Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601819/2021
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K. Owsiany
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge S Evans by CVP on 25 April 2022, dismissed the claim pursuant to Rule 52. The extracted text records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but it does not set out those reasons or any separate findings on the pleaded heads. The judgment was sent to the parties on 27 April 2022 and states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text records a global dismissal under Rule 52; this head is inferred from the case listing context and is not separately reasoned in the text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text records a global dismissal under Rule 52; this head is inferred from the case listing context and is not separately reasoned in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment text records a global dismissal under Rule 52; this head is inferred from the case listing context and is not separately reasoned in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.