Case 1601837/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J. Phillips v The Council of the City and County of Swansea and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601837/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Ms J. Phillips
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a claim for constructive unfair dismissal based on an alleged breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. It noted that the claimant remained employed by the first respondent, that her employment which began on 1 August 2016 continued, and that it was not subject to notice of termination.
The written reasons state that the claimant’s withdrawal was without prejudice to any future claim, that no evidence had been heard and no judgment had been made on the merits, and that no issues had been adjudicated. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had been a litigant in person and that the dismissal claim had been included in error. The operative conclusion recorded at the end of the reasons is that the claim was withdrawn on 20 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment initially states that the constructive unfair dismissal claim is dismissed, but the operative reasons then say the claimant remains employed, no evidence was heard, no issues were adjudicated, the dismissal claim was included in error, and 'the claim is withdrawn today'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.