Case 1601844/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S White v Wendy Smith Boocock — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601844/2019
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace determined the case on 2 January 2020 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, having found there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment upheld the claimant's notice pay claim at £576.92 and holiday pay claim at £1,153.84.
The judgment also applied a 25% uplift of £432.69, giving a total award of £2,163.45. It further stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records an award of notice pay of £576.92 and upholds that claim under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records an award of holiday pay of £1,153.84 and upholds that claim under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,163
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.