Case 1601858/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Christine Bonner v CD Gray & Associates Ltd (First Respondent) and Mr Tony Venn (Second Respondent) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601858/2018
- Decision date
- 27 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Christine Bonner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 13 May 2019, the tribunal considered the claimant's employment status. It accepted that Mrs Christine Bonner had worked for CD Gray & Associates Ltd as a part-time secretary from 30 August 2005, that employee status was undisputed until June 2015, and that in June 2015 she resigned proposing to continue as a freelance credit controller at a daily rate of £150.
Although the parties then proceeded on a freelance label from 1 July 2015, with invoices, self-assessment, and no holiday pay, sick pay or pension contributions, the tribunal found the reality did not change into self-employment. It found mutuality of obligation, personal service, no realistic right of substitution, significant control by Mr Christopher Gray over the work performed, and an expectation that the claimant would work at least four days a week and notify him of absences or changes.
The tribunal also found that the claimant remained integrated into the first respondent's business, using its offices, email address, meetings and staff activities, and that the splitting of invoices between CD Gray and Terra Firma was a broad-brush allocation rather than a separate freelance business. It held that the claimant was an employee of the first respondent throughout, including when carrying out Terra Firma work, and listed a further case management preliminary hearing for the substantive claims, which were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary status issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant was an employee of the first respondent throughout, including after 1 July 2015, despite the freelance label and invoicing arrangements. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.230(1) ERA 1996
- s.230(2) ERA 1996
- s.230(3) ERA 1996
- s.83(2) Equality Act 2010
- Ready Mixed Concrete
- Autoclenz v Belcher
- Young & Woods Ltd v West
- Hall v Lorimer
- Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP
- Catholic Child Welfare Society v Various Claimants
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.