Case 1601861/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs C Turner Mrs B Stefanowski Mr R Healey Mr S Rogers Ms W Bloomfield Mr N Pompeus v Nytram Group Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1601861/2021
Decision date: 1 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Jenkins Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Turner Mrs B Stefanowski Mr R Healey Mr S Rogers Ms W Bloomfield Mr N Pompeus

Respondent

Nytram Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment on the claim of Mrs C Turner only. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided that determination could properly be made on the papers. The other named claimants were not determined in this judgment and were said to proceed to the Final Hearing on 7 November 2022.

For Mrs C Turner, the tribunal upheld a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,692. It also upheld a breach of contract claim relating to notice on dismissal and ordered damages of £6,400 gross.

The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £346 gross. The total sum payable to Mrs C Turner was £10,438.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Determined under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded the gross sum stated in the judgment.	Upheld	—	£3,692
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the gross sum stated in the judgment.	Upheld	—	£6,400
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded the gross sum stated in the judgment.	Upheld	—	£346

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £10,438; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.