Case 1601865/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I Gwozdz v Formation Furniture Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601865/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs I Gwozdz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint treated as a claim for a protective award for failure to consult under TULR(C)A 1992. The tribunal proceeded in the claimant's absence after she said she could not attend because she was in Poland looking after her sick husband, and determined the preliminary issue on the documents before it.
The tribunal found that the claimant's employment ended on 18 August 2020 and that her ET1 was filed on 26 January 2022, outside the statutory time limit. The claimant said she had not known about her right to complain and was an immigrant unfamiliar with the regulations.
The tribunal accepted it was more likely than not that the claimant did not know she could bring a protective award complaint within the primary time limit, but was not persuaded that her ignorance was reasonable or that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time. In the alternative, the tribunal was not persuaded that the later delay was reasonable. Time was not extended and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint for a protective award for failure to consult under s.189 TULR(C)A 1992. It was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.189 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(5) TULR(C)A 1992
- s.18 Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.