Case 1601870/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C. Morgan v Mr V. Holden LIABILITY — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601870/2020
- Decision date
- 5 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C. Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined on the papers under Rule 21, with no hearing required. The tribunal found that Mr V. Holden had made unauthorised deductions from Ms C. Morgan’s wages in the net sum of £1,344.00. The judgment records that she had worked 12 weeks at an average net wage of £192 per week, had been paid for five weeks, and had not been paid for seven weeks.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract relating to notice of termination and ordered the respondent to pay £192 net notice pay in lieu by way of damages. The total sum payable in consequence of the judgment was £1,536.00. The tribunal further recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the loan agreement between the parties, treating that as a civil claim that may be appropriate for County Court action.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in the net sum of £1,344.00, described as five weeks paid and seven weeks unpaid out of 12 weeks at an average net wage of £192 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,344 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in relation to notice of termination and awarded £192 net notice pay in lieu by way of damages. | Upheld | — | £192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,536
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.