Case 1601885/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Glam Rocks Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601885/2021
- Decision date
- 6 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff and by CVP on 3 January 2023, Employment Judge R Brace held that the claimant's section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 complaint was well-founded. The tribunal made a declaration to that effect and found that the respondent had failed to pay wages for June 2021 (£1,041.67), July 2021 (£1,041.67) and September 2021 (£2,083.00).
The tribunal also found a breach of Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 because the respondent had not paid a sum in lieu of 8 days' accrued but untaken holiday at £96.15 per day. It ordered payment of £769.20 for that holiday pay entitlement and stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 found well-founded. The award comprised unpaid wages of £1,041.67 for June 2021, £1,041.67 for July 2021, and £2,083.00 for September 2021. | Upheld | — | £4,166 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found a breach of Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The award was for 8 accrued but untaken holiday days at £96.15 per day. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,936
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.