Case 1601888/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Julia Jurak v Croeso Staff Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601888/2019
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Julia Jurak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace decided the case under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, Croeso Staff Limited. The judgment records that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the claim properly without a respondent response.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay claim and awarded £1,225.60 in respect of 153.2 hours of untaken annual leave. No separate award breakdown is given beyond that single figure.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld holiday pay in respect of 153.2 hours untaken annual leave. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,226 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,226
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.