Case 1601891/2021 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr E Walters 2. Rhys Walters 3. Ian Walters 4. Seth Corcoran 5. David Hughes v Perpetuus Carbon Technologies Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601891/2021
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr E Walters 2. Rhys Walters 3. Ian Walters 4. Seth Corcoran 5. David Hughes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 November 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because of failure to comply with case management orders. The claimants did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
In those circumstances, Employment Judge Brace ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim(s), and it does not include any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a substantive claim type; it records that the claim was struck out after the claimants failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 17 November 2022 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.