Case 1601898/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Papa v Doma Catering Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601898/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Papa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Papa’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. Employment Judge S Jenkins heard the case at Cardiff by video on 30 January 2023. The respondent, Doma Catering Limited, did not appear or present representation. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £13,372.14 in respect of that claim.
The claimant’s claim for payment for accrued but untaken holiday also succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £445.50 in respect of that claim. No separate legal reasoning is set out in the short written record beyond the tribunal’s conclusions and the amounts awarded.
The decision was given orally at the hearing. The written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless a request had been made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £13,372.14. | Upheld | — | £13,372 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of the gross sum of £445.50. | Upheld | — | £446 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,818
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.