Case 1601908/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Wallis v The Magic Cottage Abergavenny CIC — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601908/2021
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Wallis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent, The Magic Cottage Abergavenny CIC, and said there was sufficient material before it to make a proper determination. On that basis, Employment Judge R Brace upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid holiday pay, notice pay, and unlawful deductions.
The judgment records the specific gross sums awarded for each head of claim: £150 for unpaid holiday pay, £375 for notice pay, and £315 for unlawful deductions. The judgment does not split any further remedy components beyond those individual amounts.
The tribunal also stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded. The judgment was dated 13 May 2022 and sent to the parties on 19 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Upheld as unpaid holiday pay (gross). | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld as notice pay (gross). | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld as unlawful deductions. | Upheld | — | £315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £840
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.