Case 1601914/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Rees v Mr M Lock t/a The Marxian Club — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601914/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Mason Representation
- Venue
- Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Rees
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at the Wales Employment Tribunal in Cardiff on 28 October 2022 before Employment Judge P Mason. The tribunal recorded its judgment orally at the hearing and sent the written record to the parties on 1 November 2022.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages. It found that the Respondent had not paid the Claimant in lieu of her accrued leave, and ordered payment of £1,439.06 gross.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with employment particulars pursuant to s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. It ordered payment of £208.56 gross in respect of that finding. The combined award recorded in the judgment is £1,647.62 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages because the Respondent did not pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued leave. | Upheld | — | £1,439 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with employment particulars pursuant to s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £209 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,648
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.