Case 1601929/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Anderson v Brenntag UK Limited Heard: by video — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601929/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Panel members
- Mr B Roberts, Mr D Gwyer-Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Anderson brought claims against Brenntag UK Limited for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination on the ground of disability, and discrimination on the ground of age. The case was heard by Employment Judge S Jenkins sitting with Mr B Roberts and Mr D Gwyer-Roberts on 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 November 2020, with the claimant represented by a solicitor and the respondent represented by counsel.
The judgment records only the tribunal's final determination. It states that all of the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed. No separate findings of liability, remedy, or compensation are recorded in the written decision provided.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. On the face of the extracted judgment text, there is no further explanation of the tribunal's reasoning or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.