Case 1601935/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Walsh v Konsulter Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601935/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Walsh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Harfield Date. On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £3,269.27.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,538.48. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £353.85. The extracted judgment gives no further reasoning beyond those findings.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £5,161.60.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross/net sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,269 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £354 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,162
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.