Case 1601937/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jones v Corporate Facilities Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601937/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders dated 26 October 2021, the tribunal gave Mr A Jones an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why his claim should not be struck out. The reasons recorded were that he had repeatedly failed to attend hearings and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 12 to 13 May 2022 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant repeatedly failed to attend hearings and had not actively pursued the case. The claimant was given an opportunity by case management orders dated 26 October 2021 to make representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.